Vaccinations: A Modern Perspective on an Overstimulated Immune System

By Erin Biberston, Board-Certified Holistic Health Coach | Restore Vitality

For decades, vaccines have been regarded as one of modern medicine’s greatest tools — yet history tells a more complicated story. Independent research highlighted by VaccineForensics.com shows that the first inactivated flu vaccines developed in the 1940s contained highly toxic ingredients such as mercury (thimerosal), formaldehyde, and animal proteins. These early formulations were not only harsh on the body but were also far less effective than claimed. For example, a 1955 JAMA review questioned the effectiveness of the early polio vaccines, and a 2018 Lancet Respiratory Medicine study found influenza vaccines to be largely ineffective in adults over 65 — the very population they were designed to protect.

Even large-scale reviews by The Cochrane Collaboration concluded that mandating flu vaccines for healthcare workers “has no efficacy against influenza,” nor does it reduce transmission to the elderly in long-term care settings. Despite these findings, vaccine mandates accelerated in the mid-20th century, driven more by pharmaceutical influence than true public need.

This historical context matters because it helps explain why so many people today experience what I refer to as vaccine residue — the lingering toxic, energetic, and immune-disruptive effects left behind after inoculation. In my practice, we have been supporting vaccine-injured individuals for many years using natural vibropathic protocols designed to clear these residues and restore harmony to the immune system.

Over-Vaccination: A Modern Pattern

As a society, we’ve become heavily over-vaccinated — and not just humans, but even our pets. Today, babies receive more injections in the first year of life than any other generation before them.

Originally, flu vaccines were targeted toward groups where the risk-benefit calculation made sense — military personnel living in close quarters and the elderly, who were prone to secondary pneumonias.

But in 2002, the same flu vaccine was recommended for infants — whose immune systems are in their purest, most responsive state. This shift crossed a biological line. A newborn’s immune system is divinely designed to learn through gentle environmental exposures, not intense chemical stimulation. Injecting a developing immune system with toxic

preservatives and protein fragments bypasses the body’s natural defenses and imposes confusion on its energetic blueprint.

The Hidden Burdens Babies Inherit

Every baby is born with more than DNA — they also inherit the mother's heavy-metal burden.

Research shows that cord blood often contains measurable levels of:

• mercury
• lead
• cadmium
• arsenic
• and other toxic metals

These early exposures influence how a child responds to later stressors — including vaccines. This helps explain why some babies experience strong reactions while others appear unaffected. I often describe it as the body playing “Russian roulette” with whatever burdens it already carries.

When the COVID-19 vaccine was introduced, we witnessed the same pattern: some tolerated it well, while others experienced severe neurological, cardiac, or autoimmune reactions within days.

One explanation I’ve observed repeatedly involves parasites — particularly trichinosis, carried through undercooked pork. When someone harboring parasites receives an intense injection, it can agitate the parasites, leading to constriction of muscles and, in severe cases, the heart. This is one reason some individuals experienced sudden cardiac events after vaccination.

Vaccine reactions often reveal what was already inside the body — not just what was injected into it.

What Hanna Kroeger Knew Long Before Modern Studies

Healer Hanna Kroeger taught extensively about Inoculations and Disease Residues, saying:

“Vaccinations are an assault on the body’s natural immune system. They bypass the body’s defenses and introduce poisons such as mercury, lead, animal pus, and diseased organ parts. These residues have been linked to ADD, ADHD, autism, SIDS, seizures, and even death.”

She also emphasized that traditional childhood illnesses — measles, mumps, chickenpox — serve an important spiritual and immune-strengthening purpose when experienced naturally.

These teachings are exactly what I continue to see reflected in modern saliva testing.

What I See in Saliva Testing Today

Within the last few years — especially post-COVID — my saliva testing findings have shown striking patterns.

Common findings include:

• Snake venom frequencies (a constrictor, energetically linked to immune suppression)
• Arsenic (now appearing more consistently in nearly everyone)
• Residual vaccine frequencies (tetanus, smallpox, chickenpox, and more)
• Thuja occ. frequency appearing in vaccine-injured individuals

Arsenic, in particular, is showing up far more frequently since 2020. Chronic exposure to arsenic can weaken the immune system and suppress detox pathways — potentially explaining why many people feel more reactive or “inflamed” than they did before the pandemic years.

Saliva testing helps us identify which burdens the body is still holding — often decades after the original inoculation.

A Balanced Perspective

While vaccines have been promoted as essential public-health tools, the wisdom of Hanna Kroeger — combined with historical research and modern energetic testing — reveals deeper layers.

Vaccines can introduce toxins and energetic residues the body may not clear on its own. These residues can influence:

• immunity
• neurology
• emotional well-being
• hormones
• energetic balance
• cardiovascular function

For example, the tetanus residue often shows up years later and may subtly affect the central nervous system, causing anxiety or an internal sense of agitation.

Vaccination should always be a choice, never a universal requirement.

Each body is unique. What one person tolerates, another may not — especially if hidden burdens are already present.

Final Thoughts

Our immune systems are masterpieces of divine intelligence. They do not need constant stimulation — they need cleansing, nourishment, and alignment with their natural design.

The question is never just, “Should I get this vaccine?” but “What is my body already carrying?”

When we clear the burdens, like  parasites, heavy metals, fungal residues, and vaccine imprints, then the body heals the way it was always meant to.

True immunity cannot be manufactured. It can only be awakened.

If you would like to explore what your body may be holding — parasites, fungus, heavy metals, or vaccine residues — feel free to contact me at Restore Vitality to receive instructions on how to complete a saliva test and begin understanding your own internal landscape.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

About Erin Biberston

Erin Biberston is a Board-Certified Holistic Health Coach and founder of Restore Vitality. She specializes in helping clients reverse chronic illness by identifying underlying imbalances such as heavy-metal toxicity, parasitic burden, vaccine residues, and methylation issues.

Through saliva testing, OligoScan mineral analysis, vibrational medicine, and energy-based detoxification inspired by Dr. Hulda Clark and Hanna Kroeger, Erin helps clients return to balance — physically, emotionally, and spiritually.

Research References

1. Zhong Y et al. (2022). Maternal and cord blood levels of toxic metals and their association in mother–infant pairs. Frontiers in Public Health. PMCID: PMC8998578

2. Esteban-Vasallo M.D. et al. (2012). Heavy metals, maternal exposure and fetal development: a review. Environment International, 38(1): 93–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.09.005

3. Sakamoto M et al. (2010). Methylmercury and the placenta: transfer and effects. Environmental Research, 110(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.09.001

4. Boucher O et al. (2012). Neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology, 33(3): 447–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.01.005

5. Jedrychowski W et al. (2009). Prenatal lead exposure and developmental outcomes in children. Neurotoxicology, 30(4): 615–622. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.04.002

6. Gao Y et al. (2019). Prenatal cadmium exposure and immune function in infants. Science of the Total Environment, 650: 2251–2259. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.460

7. Simeonova P.P. & Luster M.I. (2000). Mechanisms of arsenic carcinogenicity: immunosuppression by arsenic. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 172(2): 208–216.

8. Rahman A. et al. (2012). Chronic arsenic exposure and impaired vaccine antibody response in children. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(7): 921–926. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104800